By Dr Terver Zua Tule
Politics often forces ordinary citizens to choose between two competing forces: truth and survival. In societies where poverty, unemployment and dependence on government patronage are widespread, that choice is not abstract but a daily calculation with real consequences. From that dilemma arise two threats to democratic development: blind political followership and the deceit of incumbency.
Blind followership occurs when loyalty to a politician, party, ethnic group, religion or benefactor outweighs facts, principles and the public interest. A blind follower stops asking basic questions: Is this policy working? Has the promise been fulfilled? Are public resources being managed properly? Is the leader accountable? Instead, criticism is treated as betrayal, failures are defended, and wrongdoing is rationalised. When citizens surrender independent judgement, politicians grow insulated from reality; they hear praise instead of truth and applause instead of counsel. Governance drifts away from the people’s needs. History shows leaders do not improve on flattery; they improve when honest voices tell uncomfortable truths.
Incumbency brings vast advantages: control of institutions, communication channels, appointments, contracts and the flow of information. The danger comes when incumbency manufactures an alternative reality. Unfinished roads are proclaimed victories, hospitals without medicines are showcased as achievements, statistics are made to substitute lived experience and public relations replace performance. Citizens are instructed what to believe rather than being shown what they can see. No amount of advertising can erase a mother’s experience in an ill-equipped hospital, a farmer’s hardship on impassable roads or a graduate’s frustration with unemployment. Reality remains the ultimate auditor of governance.
Many people see these failures but remain silent—not from ignorance, but from necessity. The civil servant fears transfer or dismissal. The contractor fears losing work. The appointee fears removal. The businessman fears exclusion. Community leaders fear isolation. Over time, a culture of silence takes root; truth grows costly, and survival becomes the priority. Yet societies pay dearly when too many keep quiet. Problems that might have been corrected early become crises, and leaders who should change course continue toward failure.
When survival consistently defeats truth, a society eventually loses both. Truth is eroded as honest speech is suppressed. Survival itself is undermined because poor governance harms everyone, including loyalists. Economic decline does not ask for party membership cards. Failing healthcare, insecurity and a broken education system affect supporters and opponents alike.
Democracy was never designed to produce obedient followers but responsible citizens. Citizens must back good policies regardless of who proposes them and criticise bad policies regardless of who implements them. The standard must be performance, not personality. We should stop asking, “Is he my leader?” and ask, “Is this serving the people?”
The greatest threat to democracy is not opposition criticism but the combination of blind followership and unchecked incumbency. A follower who refuses to see reality is as dangerous as a leader who refuses to hear it. Progress begins when citizens value truth above political convenience and when leaders value honest feedback above manufactured praise. For nations and communities seeking genuine development, the path is clear: support leaders without worship, respect authority without surrendering reason, and protect survival without abandoning truth. Truth ignored today becomes the crisis everyone must survive tomorrow.
Leave a Reply